9/11 CONSPIRACY: WAS FLIGHT 175 A MILITARY PLANE?
When the footage of the second plane to hit the WTC is closely analyzed, there are several anomalies that are apparent. The first is an asymmetrical missile-like object on the belly of the plane that should not be on a commercial airliner. The second is the flash the emits from this “pod” a second before the impact with the building. Was this plane indeed a Commercial airliner? Was the anomaly on the underside of the plane actually a high-tech weapon? See “In plane site” for free of google video for more information.
Duration : 0:1:5
[youtube ZzbVn3o8JNE]
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Thank You …
Thank You AmericanPatriot2009, yes it is a hanous insult to the dead, as well as an afront to logic and decency.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
dont be ing …
dont be ing stupid, all the weight on weakened steel is bound to cause a reation.
the steel was obviously weakened and the weight of the upper floors caused the steal to buckle and break away. steal isnt indestructable, and your right it doesnt melt under fire, but it does weaken, and if you have a quarter of 200,000 tons resting on weakened steel beams, what the you think is going to happen?
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
one your wrong …
one your wrong thermate is very often used in controlled demolition
the delay is caused by the build up of air pressure in the tower
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
well auctully the …
well auctully the government planned this, you see the thing AIR FORCE on the plane it means it was runned by the government who runs the Military ( Government ) Marines? ( Government ) Then it means the government runs the Air Force Too see it was all planned by the government but my question is why?
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
thermate cannot be …
thermate cannot be used for for controlled demolition, because no working device has been proven to cut vertical columns like those in the wtc.
There’s remains of thermate because it was used to cut the steel girders in the clean up process. It’s been well documented.
Free fall from the top of the towers (416 meters) takes ~9.1 seconds. The towers collapsed at around 12 seconds depending on which video you watch. It if was free fall, why didn’t it collapse in 9 seconds? Why the delay?
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
thermate the …
thermate the controlled emolition form of thermite has been used as it cuts through structural steel like a knife through butter
and how do you explain that many physics and chemistry sceintist have faound the remain of thernate on steel from tower 1,2,&7
you cant compair thermite to atomic weapons as there is no explosive property
the transfer of of momentum between floors also creates resistance which doesnt happen as it falls at free fall speed
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
thermite has never, …
thermite has never, ever been used in demolition because it does not work like an explosive and would be inefficient and expensive. The amount of thermite need to take down the towers would equal that of an atomic bomb. Also, it would take countless man hours to install and would be next to impossible to prevent anyone from noticing
The buildings fall in the time they do because of the transfer or momentum between each floor. You are an tard if you dont believe science.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
I really havent …
I really havent researched it enough to decide whether i believe it was a conspiracy by our government or not; however, what exactly is the point of killing a load of our own people?Also, if it wasn’t a real airplane what about the people who were supposed to be on the planes that hit the towers and pentagon? Another thing, the plane that was crashed in Pennsylvania. Are y’all saying that all the phone calls and the people taking over and crashing he plane was all planned?
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
the goverment …
the goverment planed this
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
at least there are …
at least there are a few people on here that can see past the gov’t lies thanks for the support
have you seen the zeitgeist movie if not watch it skip to about 40 min in thats when they talk about 9/11
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Yeah I seen the …
Yeah I seen the steel beams still standing were cut at an angle..they planned this did you know the homeland security officer quit his job just to work for the world trade towers security ..then he suddenly died in the fire they say..I doubt it. They pay these bad guys..fake their deaths..kill the innocent and enslave us with their lies!
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
what can make it …
what can make it fall at free fall speed and why has there been studies done on the steel of all 3 buildings that have thermate the demoliton version of thermite and if it had beed the floors giving way from the core of the structure why wasnt there 1000 ft of steel in the sky pancaking in this way does need explosives because the steel structure in the pancaking your discribing would stay in the air because noting cut the lower support by the way pancaking is a controlled demolition term
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
you have obviously …
you have obviously not been paying attention, i’ve given facts i never made an opinion in this agruement
look at wtc7 then 1 and see the difference , wtc7 was caused by a steel girder on floor 13 losing its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building causing a demolition like effect
then look at 1 it has a completely different effect called pancaking which does not require an epxlosion to begin
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
there are plenty of …
there are plenty of these pictures google it you dumb
and dont call me a kid your only one year older than i am
so having actual insight into construction and design of a building fills me with than you must be empty cause there is no base in your argument you have not put up any facts to support your claims
go research for your own argument
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Very good! I like!
Very good! I like!
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
very good
very good
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
find me a pic of …
find me a pic of this steel that you mysteriously found in the rubble
and what i was saying before, only wtc7 fell like a demolition, the 1 effect on 1 and 2 would have been impossible with explosives
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
lol your funny, …
lol your funny, really funny
kid let me tell you something…
you proved to me that your full of bullshit i
n
“did you know to make a building collapse you need to cut the supports on an angle”
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
9/11 was a Pentagon …
9/11 was a Pentagon scenario played out. see “Operation Northwoods”
-But Skip all that because Demanding The Answers is like Trying to Stop a Tiger by Grabbing its Tail
Try Blocking it’s Path Instead ie We Better Start WORRYING ABOUT THEIR NEXT FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON Us
All indications promise that the Pentagon WILL VERY SOON DO IT AGAIN as a pretext to MORE WAR. In order to Blame the same innocent civilizations or pick a NEW govt to Villify
“Bio Terror From South America” Kills1,000,000
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
conspiracys are …
conspiracys are bullshit. lets just honor the people who died and get on with our lives.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
i am in the …
i am in the construction buisness my dad is an engeneer and i know demolition explosive experts and weve annalysed the collapse the design and the after math
did you know to make a building collapse you need to cut the supports on an angle
if you search through pictures of the ruble youll find perfect angles on many of main support collumns
if fire was the only factor that brought the buildings down none of the steel should have theses angles they should be twisted or bent off
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
i have studied and …
i have studied and examined both sides of this issue but there are to many unexplained fact that lead me to wonder how did that happen
i would like you to explain to me why the only three steel building that have collapsed because of fire happened on 9/11
how do you explain the documented molten steel in the base ments of towers 1 2 and 7 espeacially the fact that there was no jet fuel in wtc 7
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
“Whats done is done …
“Whats done is done”
This still affects all of us everywhere!
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
i dont need to, i …
i dont need to, i get my info from a wide range of people, when i need construction info i find a guy in the construction business, when i need aviation and explosives i find an aviation and explosives expert
and i know what temp construction-grade steel melts
your the one argueing with scientific facts, saying that the building was taken down by explosives
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Construction-grade …
Construction-grade steel melts at 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. If you want to argue with science fact, I think you should be little more careful about what you write. by the way I can tell, u never been in the construction business.